Common Challenges In Mobile Testing Services

Mobile devices are growing in popularity at an indescribable rate. Nearly every individual has a smart phone, tablet or another mobile device; even household appliances are not immune to this growing market. The prevalence of mobile devices and applications means that software testing is even more essential. Like with any sort of endeavor, there are bound to be challenges in mobile testing. Below is a list of the 7 most common obstacles organizations and QA engineers face in testing mobile devices and applications.

Diverse devices, configurations and OS

Perhaps the most prevalent challenge with mobile testing services is the devices itself. There are numerous kinds of mobile devices, such as iPods, iPads, Android and Windows devices. There are also many different configurations and operating systems for each of these devices. QA engineers and developers have to make sure your application can function correctly across the vast number of devices and configurations.

Different types of apps

On top of seeing if an app will work across devices, carriers and OS, testers need to be aware of the different kinds of applications. QA engineers must consider particular requirements of native apps, web apps and hybrid apps.

Variety of screen sizes

Another obstacle that QA testers face is the difference in screen sizes. An application may work well on an iPad and the screen will show everything that is intended to be shown, but that application may not work as well on smaller screens.

Multiple carriers and connection types

Verizon, Sprint, T-mobile and AT&T are just a few of the carriers that mobile testers need to consider. Not all carriers will have the same network standards, amount of data or coverage. Also, QA engineers need to consider the various connection types as well. How will an app work using a 3G network as compared to a 4G network? How about over Wi-Fi? How will the app work in airplane mode or if there’s no connection? Even though carrier testing is not that important any more, bandwidth and connectivity are all questions that QA engineers have to consider as they test your mobile application.


Another obstacle that mobile testers face is internationalization. Translating applications into other languages can prove difficult. This is especially true if the language reads right to left, such as Arabic and Hebrew, instead of left to right, such as English and Spanish.

Lack of time or tools

Some organizations simply may not have the time to thoroughly test their application. They also may not have the tools needed to properly test their application. These two obstacles could cause the application to be released into the market without adequate testing, which could result in dissatisfied customers and a loss in profit.

Inexperienced testers

Sometimes an organization’s QA team simply doesn’t have the experience or knowledge to test their application. Also, an organization might have their developers testing their application instead of QA engineers. Having developers test as well may seem like it will save money, however, that is not the case. The application will lose quality because developers are not trained to look at an app in the same way testers are. Testers are willing to “break” an application in order to ensure that the finished application is of the utmost quality. Developers, understandably, may not wish to “break” their creation. This could result in critical errors appearing later on.

How can one get past these challenges?

  • Hire a QA provider

One way to conquer these hurdles is to hire a software testing company that offers mobile testing. An efficient testing company will already have the tools you need to test your application. If your QA provider tests offshore, you will save valuable time as the QA engineers will test when your day has ended. The best mobile testing services providers will have ways to overcome these common obstacles.

  • Have a testing lab

Efficient mobile testing partners will have a cutting-edge lab dedicated to mobile testing. This lab will contain numerous devices and multiple configurations of these devices so your application is tested thoroughly. This will also help with testing across different screen sizes and operating systems.

  • Have experienced engineers

These companies will have highly trained engineers with years of experience in testing and expertise in a wide variety of testing tools. These skilled engineers would have been trained in the latest methods of testing and they will be determined to find bugs in your application early on, so your developers will have more time to fix the bugs and ensure your application is of the best quality.

Benefit from fantastic savings on , just by taking a look at

SharePoint 2016 Is Setting the Standards for Collaboration Platforms – Here’s How

To say SharePoint 2016 is the best version of the popular enterprise collaboration platform from Microsoft is a serious understatement. You see, at certain points in time, certain versions of software products arrive, which not only do what they are supposed to do in a better way than anyone else, but also set a precedence for others to follow. With SharePoint 2016, we feel that Microsoft has accomplished pretty much something like that. Here’s why.

Seamless compatibility with associated products

SharePoint Server 2016 not only offers out of the box support for Microsoft’s latest server operating system, but also the latest version of SQL Server. This integrated support structure brings many benefits to SharePoint users. On one hand, you have updates to security and virtualization in the OS, while on the other, the Stretch Database technology with Azure for hybrid setups. This not only ensures excellent compatibility across the board for customers, but also ensures long term loyalty from them.

Superior support for hybrid structure

Any on-premise collaboration platform these days needs to have a strong online presence, due to the way people are steadily moving towards the cloud. With SharePoint 2016, Microsoft has gone all the way, offering support for anything between 100% online operation to hybrid networks, where on-prem and cloud based elements work together.Support for Office 365 OneDrive allows quick document sharing and access from any device, while hybrid search (which involves content indexing via crawling through content stored in on-prem and cloud locations)lets users find content efficiently, within seconds. What’s more – tools such as Delve and Office Graph, which are designed for the cloud, also work with on-prem installations of SharePoint Server.

Greatly improved user interface

If you have on-prem and online versions of similar products, it makes sense to offer a unified experience to users. With SharePoint, this time around, Microsoft has done just that. Whether a customer decides to go for the on-premversion or stick to SharePoint Online, they essentially get to work with the same user interface. Not only that, the all new App Launcher lets users launch their Office 365 apps through the tiles themselves.

Enhanced maintenance of compliance

When you work with a hybrid environment, ensuring data security becomes a major issue. With SharePoint 2016, Microsoft has ensured that with the help of an In-Place Policy Hold Center. It lets admins establish time-based data retention for a preset time interval. It is pretty much like the cloud-based Compliance Center in Office 365, which means users will find it easy to use. Not only that, SharePoint 2016 also supports data loss prevention (DLP) technologies built into Office 365, such as document fingerprinting.

All in all, with SharePoint 2016, Microsoft has taken a giant step towards dominating the market for enterprise collaboration platforms. In the coming days, we believe users can expect bigger and better features from newer iterations of the platform. This does not bode well for competitors of Microsoft, who not only need to adapt to the emerging technologies, but also match (or try to exceed) what Microsoft has achieved. Only time will tell whether they will succeed, but one thing is for sure – customers are the ones who stand to benefit the most from this battle of the brands.

Real Devices Vs Emulators

To check the mobile applications and programs, the testers can use both real devices and emulators. The procedure of product testing on actual devices demonstrates the real behavior of the app utilized by the end users.

Emulators are not real devices. They just imitate the main features of the mobile software. Emulators should be installed on PC or mobile device. Besides that, the specialists can also use simulators – virtual devices. There are several differences between simulators and emulators.

How Do Simulators Differ from Emulator-Based Testing?

  • Development language. Simulators are created in the languages of a high level. Emulators – in the assembly language of a machine-level.
  • Debugging. It may be rather difficult to use simulators for debugging, and emulators are more suitable for this purpose.
  • Replacement of the original software. Simulators submit the software only partially, and emulators can submit it totally.
  • Simulators are oriented to testing of the external behavior of the product, while emulators – to the internal behavior.
  • Simulators are designed to simulate the internal state of the product, while emulators – imitate the outer behavior.

Often, there are such situations when the usage of emulators/simulators is more convenient than the testing on real devices. For example, the deadline is coming and there is not enough time to buy a real device or it is impossible to get it in a short period time. In such a case, the emulators are the way out.

Besides that, it is impossible to get every model of the mobile device required for testing (especially, when the budget is limited). Emulators help to save money and time. Usually, they are free of charge and to use them, it is necessary just download the emulator and run it.

Emulators are more suitable for web testing, as one should only cope-past the URL of the developed application to launch it. And for testers, it is easier to make the screenshots of the detected errors on emulators.

But the main disadvantage of emulator-based testing is that emulators cannot imitate the issues of the product battery. Moreover, it is impossible to simulate various interruptions, e.g. incoming calls, notifications, messages, etc.

It is rather difficult to imitate the full performance capacities of the product. Usually, they are lower than the original software has. But the mobile devices have their own minuses.

What Are the Cons of Real Devices?

  • The price of modern mobile devices is really high.
  • The number of available mobile devices – their models and OS version – is large. It is impossible to have a device of every type and model.
  • During unit testing, it is difficult to connect the real devices with the IDE.
  • Sometimes the USB port that connects the real device and machine does not work properly. Thus, the test results will not be correct.

Despite all pluses and minuses, the choice of emulator or real device should be based on thorough analysis of product peculiarities, deadlines, available budget and resources.

To perform mobile testing, desktop testing or web site testing efficiently these methods should be adjusted for each company and each project. QATestLab is independent, offshore software testing company located in Kiev, Ukraine. QATestLab performs testing of products on each stage of software development cycle.